Washington, D.C. – Oregon’s U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley and Virginia’s U.S. Senator Tim Kaine penned an op-ed in today’s Washington Post about their Proteger a nuestros ciudadanos de la extorsión imprudente de nuestra deuda y tácticas irresponsables (Proteja nuestro CRÉDITO) Ley de 2023—legislation aimed at ending Congress’ abuse of the debt ceiling as a political hostage. Merkley and Kaine present The Protege nuestra Ley de CRÉDITO as a common-sense, middle ground approach to solving the looming debt ceiling standoff – based on Mitch McConnell’s own solution for defusing a past debt crisis.
Click here to read Merkley and Kaine’s op-ed in the Washington Post.
El Ley Proteja Nuestro CRÉDITO – cosponsored by Sens. Chris Coons (D-DE), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) – would reform the process of raising the debt ceiling by making the following changes:
- Requerir al Presidente que inicie un proceso, antes del inicio del año fiscal, para determinar la cantidad de deuda necesaria para ese año y proponer un nuevo límite de deuda basado en la cantidad de gastos autorizados y asignados por el Congreso.
- Elevar el tope de la deuda al límite propuesto a menos que, dentro de los 15 días legislativos, el Congreso apruebe y el Presidente firme una resolución conjunta de desaprobación. Una resolución de desaprobación conjunta del Congreso recibiría una consideración especial de vía rápida, ya que se colocaría en el calendario legislativo dentro de los 5 días y recibiría una consideración acelerada por parte de ambas cámaras.
- Si, durante el año, la deuda federal se acerca a $250 mil millones del límite, el Presidente deberá presentar otra certificación por escrito, explicando qué impulsó la necesidad de deuda adicional y proponiendo un nuevo límite de deuda para el resto del año fiscal, sujeto a la mismo proceso de desaprobación del Congreso.
The idea of having the President increase the debt ceiling, subject to a vote of congressional disapproval, was originally proposed by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2011 to allow the debt limit increase to go forward without requiring Republicans to take an affirmative vote. McConnell’s proposal was incorporated into the Ley de Control Presupuestario de 2011, which passed in August 2011 and authorized the President to increase the debt ceiling in three installments. While the broader Budget Control Act had numerous flaws, the mechanism proposed under the McConnell plan was a key to avoiding a disastrous debt default.
Hacer que este proceso para elevar el techo de la deuda sea permanente terminaría con el uso del techo de la deuda como una herramienta para el chantaje político y protegería a los Estados Unidos de las terribles ramificaciones de un posible incumplimiento. Este movimiento de procedimiento es necesario para salvar la economía, y el Congreso debería adoptarlo.
texto del proyecto de ley Ley Proteja Nuestro CRÉDITO puede ser encontrado aquí.
Merkley and Kaine’s op-ed can be read on the Washington Post’s website o por debajo:
Mitch McConnell offered a debt-ceiling fix in 2011. We should do it now.
By Jeff Merkley and Tim Kaine
With the United States on the verge of yet another debt limit crisis, numerous paths to avoid default are being floated, including a trillion-dollar coin, steep cuts to Social Security and Medicare, and challenging the constitutionality of the debt limit altogether.
These proposals ignore a simple solution that, conveniently, already exists: the McConnell plan.
In 2011, during the last major debt limit standoff, circumstances were very similar to those of today: a Republican-controlled House, Democratic-controlled Senate and Democratic president, and the risk of default looming because House Republicans refused to raise the debt limit and pay bills that past Congresses had already incurred. When talks between House Republicans and the president faltered, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) proposed a plan for the debt ceiling.
His proposal, which was later included in the Budget Control Act of 2011, allowed President Barack Obama to increase the debt ceiling, subject to a potential override by Congress. If lawmakers wanted to stop it, Congress could pass a joint resolution of congressional disapproval. Congress still had oversight, but the McConnell plan took the weaponization of the debt ceiling off the table.
While the broader Budget Control Act had numerous flaws, the McConnell plan itself was a good solution then, and it remains a good solution today.
This month, we introduced the Protect Our Credit Act of 2023, which would make McConnell’s fix permanent.
This legislation would put the power to prevent default in the hands of the president, with Congress acting as a check. In other words — just as McConnell proposed, the bipartisan Congress passed and the Obama administration implemented in 2011 — Congress could only stop the president from raising the debt ceiling if a veto-proof two-thirds majority of lawmakers agreed it was the right thing to do.
In 2011, McConnell himself said: “It’s extremely important that the country reassure the markets that default is not an option, and reassure Social Security recipients and families of military veterans that default is not an option.”
McConnell had it right in 2011. A dozen years later, the clock is ticking to protect jobs; interest rates for mortgages, car loans and student loans; and our broader economy from unnecessary and self-inflicted disaster. We would do well to make this proposal permanent. We could finally end this episodic crisis by putting a stop to using the debt ceiling as a tool for political blackmail.
###
Spanish 
English